Every few weeks, it seems like another article declares the Metaverse dead because XR hasn’t reached the heights of success seen by the internet’s two dominant platforms: websites and social media. While social media technically runs on websites, let's treat them as separate entities for this discussion—and here’s why. Websites gained prominence during the first generation of the internet, often referred to as the Information Age. This era, emerging post-Arpanet, was focused on sharing information, especially since Arpanet didn’t permit commercial content or marketing. The foundational infrastructure of the Internet was established before capitalism turned it into a landscape cluttered with pop-ups and banner ads. Social media existed back then, but it was neither as complex nor as user-friendly as it is today.
The Rise of Social Media: Fast forward to 2005, when the social media wars erupted—a race to become the dominant platform for attention, offering an initially ad-free experience. Ultimately, Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube emerged as leaders in their respective domains. YouTube dominated video sharing, Twitter became the go-to for real-time updates and idea sharing, while Facebook took over nearly every other facet of online interaction for a time. When Instagram launched, Facebook quickly acquired it, adding another powerful tool to its arsenal. This era of social media was highly engaging—until ads began flooding everyone’s feeds. Today, when you open Facebook, every third post is an ad, turning what was once an enjoyable experience into something far less pleasant.
The Delayed Arrival of the Metaverse: So why hasn’t the Metaverse experienced the same level of success? Simply put, the Metaverse hasn’t truly arrived yet. Each generation of the internet has focused on a different aspect. The first generation was the Information Age, information sharing via websites. The second, which we are currently in, is centered around social media—hence its designation as the “Social Age.” The next generation will be defined by the "Immersive Age" or Immersive Internet, with the Metaverse as its cornerstone. We still have a few years to go, but that’s not necessarily a bad thing, especially for early adopters. The infrastructure required for an immersive internet is still in its infancy. The first two generations of the internet benefited from decades of research and development, largely free from the pressures of corporate greed. The Arpanet, the precursor to today’s internet, was backed by government and educational institutions. XR, however, hasn’t had the same luxury of time to mature before being commercialized. Sure, there was early VR prototypes that were developed for military and educational research use, but it wasn’t until Palmer Luckey launched Oculus via Kickstarter that the idea of consumer-level XR kits gained public attention. Facebook’s acquisition of Oculus in 2014 further pushed XR into the mainstream.
What Is the Metaverse? Ask a group of experts what the Metaverse is, and you’ll likely get four or five different answers. Some might say it’s too early to define the Metaverse, yet they continue working on their vision of what it could become. I see the Metaverse as the natural evolution and byproduct of the third generation of the internet—a series of interconnected virtual worlds, accessible through a single “browser,” where users can easily transfer their settings, assets, avatars, and more across different environments. Key components of the Metaverse will likely include virtual persistence, blockchain-based assets, and interoperability. When I speak at conferences, I often say we’re still a few years away. One day I’ll be proven wrong, and I couldn’t be more excited for that moment.
What’s Holding Back the Metaverse? We’re moving towards the Metaverse, but progress is slow. XR faces significant accessibility challenges—headsets are as expensive as some PCs—and there’s a notable lack of content. With each new generation of VR headsets, games often aren’t compatible, forcing users to repurchase the same titles for different devices. This lack of cross-compatibility and backward compatibility is a puzzling decision by major XR headset manufacturers, especially given the limited content available. The industry is stuck in a chicken-and-egg scenario: consumers aren’t buying headsets due to their high cost and limited content, and manufacturers aren’t investing in new content because of low headset adoption. If we can overcome this hurdle and get headsets into the hands of more users, fostering relationships and increasing usage, we’ll be on the path to mass adoption. Only then can we reach the next generation of the internet—provided we also address the infrastructure challenges needed to support the Metaverse on a large scale.
If you enjoyed this article, please share it with someone who you think would enjoy it. You can also reach me on Twitter, and Instagram.
